When we write in plain language, that means writing in a way that makes information:
This is what every content creator strives for. But why? Aside from sounding nice, does plain language really matter? Here is some advice from three content strategist to help you decide.
At Confab 2019, Erika Hall talked about Conversational Design and addressed the difference between “oral” and “literate” language. Erika offered examples of how something might be said orally, vs written down. She suggested that written content is more complicated.
But not all written content needs to be complicated. What Erika calls “Oral” and “Literate” could also be called “good copy” and “poor copy.” The literate examples are formal, with more words than necessary. The oral examples are very casual.
Healthcare, for example, is often written in a formal, stilted language. But plainly written health information improves health literacy. When subject matter experts (such as doctors) work with UX writers they find ways to explain what you, the patient, needs in a way you can understand it. That’s why organisations like New Ocean and Cancer.net partner with companies like Mad*Pow and Visible Thread. These UX and readability partners make sure the content is clear, to the point, and readable.
Plain language can be formal, but never at the expense of literacy. Being literate should never mean the language isn’t plain and understandable.
David Dylan Thomas also spoke at Confab 2019., In his talk, Fight Bias with Content Strategy, he says that people correlate “easy to read” with “easy to do.” In other words, if instructions seem simple, then the related task will seem easy as well.
Let’s use taxes as an example. They’re complicated, but with easy-to-read instructions, they can be broken down into simple steps. A well-written set of instructions saves time and energy and may facilitate better decisions. In the US companies like TurboTax revolutionised taxes. They promise to save people money, simply by helping them understand how to do their taxes correctly.
I’ll reference one last content strategist - Scott Kubie. Scott recently wrote that content strategy is boring – and that’s ok! Scott says:
It’s OK to be boring. Boring beats baffling. Obvious beats obtuse. Articulated beats assumed. (I can do these all day.) Time and again, smart people get stymied in their content strategy work because they’re afraid to write down something that seems too simple, too obvious, too boring. Boo!
Scott Kubie, Content Strategy is Boring (and that’s okay)
Scott’s right. Strategy is about getting the simple, obvious, and important things decided. Similarly, plain language doesn’t need to be exciting. The UX pyramid speaks to significant and enjoyable experiences, but before it’s possible to have that, the information must be reliable and usable.
Take CloudSigma’s 404 page. While it’s very friendly, and has a lot of personality, it’s confusing. It doesn’t clarify what really happened, and it doesn’t offer a way to find what you were looking for.
Plain language isn’t as fun and exciting as creating a brand personality. But brand personality makes content enjoyable. Before that, it must be useful – and that’s where plain language comes in.
Here are six practical steps to help you write in plain language:
Take these steps with the creation of your next piece of content, or review existing content with the steps in mind. Finally, if you have a content style guide, think about any changes you can make to that to help others write in plain language too.
When we write in plain language, that means writing in a way that makes information:
This is what every content creator strives for. But why? Aside from sounding nice, does plain language really matter? Here is some advice from three content strategist to help you decide.
At Confab 2019, Erika Hall talked about Conversational Design and addressed the difference between “oral” and “literate” language. Erika offered examples of how something might be said orally, vs written down. She suggested that written content is more complicated.
But not all written content needs to be complicated. What Erika calls “Oral” and “Literate” could also be called “good copy” and “poor copy.” The literate examples are formal, with more words than necessary. The oral examples are very casual.
Healthcare, for example, is often written in a formal, stilted language. But plainly written health information improves health literacy. When subject matter experts (such as doctors) work with UX writers they find ways to explain what you, the patient, needs in a way you can understand it. That’s why organisations like New Ocean and Cancer.net partner with companies like Mad*Pow and Visible Thread. These UX and readability partners make sure the content is clear, to the point, and readable.
Plain language can be formal, but never at the expense of literacy. Being literate should never mean the language isn’t plain and understandable.
David Dylan Thomas also spoke at Confab 2019., In his talk, Fight Bias with Content Strategy, he says that people correlate “easy to read” with “easy to do.” In other words, if instructions seem simple, then the related task will seem easy as well.
Let’s use taxes as an example. They’re complicated, but with easy-to-read instructions, they can be broken down into simple steps. A well-written set of instructions saves time and energy and may facilitate better decisions. In the US companies like TurboTax revolutionised taxes. They promise to save people money, simply by helping them understand how to do their taxes correctly.
I’ll reference one last content strategist - Scott Kubie. Scott recently wrote that content strategy is boring – and that’s ok! Scott says:
It’s OK to be boring. Boring beats baffling. Obvious beats obtuse. Articulated beats assumed. (I can do these all day.) Time and again, smart people get stymied in their content strategy work because they’re afraid to write down something that seems too simple, too obvious, too boring. Boo!
Scott Kubie, Content Strategy is Boring (and that’s okay)
Scott’s right. Strategy is about getting the simple, obvious, and important things decided. Similarly, plain language doesn’t need to be exciting. The UX pyramid speaks to significant and enjoyable experiences, but before it’s possible to have that, the information must be reliable and usable.
Take CloudSigma’s 404 page. While it’s very friendly, and has a lot of personality, it’s confusing. It doesn’t clarify what really happened, and it doesn’t offer a way to find what you were looking for.
Plain language isn’t as fun and exciting as creating a brand personality. But brand personality makes content enjoyable. Before that, it must be useful – and that’s where plain language comes in.
Here are six practical steps to help you write in plain language:
Take these steps with the creation of your next piece of content, or review existing content with the steps in mind. Finally, if you have a content style guide, think about any changes you can make to that to help others write in plain language too.
Marli Mesibov is the VP of Content Strategy at the digital UX agency Mad*Pow. Her work spans strategy and experiences across industries, with a particular interest in healthcare, finance, and education. She is a frequent conference speaker, a former editor of the UX publication UX Booth, and was voted one of MindTouch’s Top 25 Content Strategist Influencers in 2016. Marli can also be found on Twitter, where she shares thoughts on UX Design, content strategy, and Muppets. You can learn more about her and her work at http://marli.us