Web content management represents only a fraction of those earnings. But with millions of blogs on the internet, that number is growing. As a result, many content managers are looking for ways to create, edit, publish, and update content more efficiently.
However, the big question is: are web content management systems sufficient for every content production phase? Or is there a better, more seamless way to create content on the web?
First, let’s consider some common system types within the broader realm of content management. Then, we’ll cover the purpose, pros, and cons of web content management systems specifically, and what their future looks like. Not to mention how they help you execute the content-specific aspects of your digital marketing strategy from end to end.
Any content creator will tell you that there are several types of content. Similarly, there's a variety of content management systems.
Here are some types of content management systems you use in your personal and work life:
WCMSs help users create, edit, publish, and update web page content without needing web development skills or markup languages.
Without them, we’d all need to be proficient HTML users to write and publish website content. (I couldn't do that. Could you?) These systems allow us to create front-end content easily while they handle the back-end code.
Popular WCMS providers include WordPress.com, Joomla, and Drupal.
Digital asset management systems enable users to upload, store, organize, and share digital assets. Companies use them to store logos, videos, audio files, presentations, documents, and even digital content for sale.
These DAM systems allow for regular updating, backup, and syncing across the organization. Admin users can also set permissions, grant, deny, or revoke access to their assets over time.
Examples of DAM systems are Aprimo and Adobe Experience Manager Assets.
Enterprise content management is a company-wide management solution. Organization and distribution of assets and content are at the core of this system type.
Technically, DAM is a type of ECM. An organization’s ECM is how it manages all content, from product data and inventory to digital assets and documents.
Popular examples of enterprise content management systems include Microsoft and IBM.
This form of content management is among the more complex systems. A CCM system manages content at the word, phrase, and paragraph level instead of recording pages and pages of content.
CCM systems use extensible markup language (XML), which is a bit like HTML, to manage content.
One common CCM system is DITA CCMS by IXIASOFT.
Document management systems store digital paperwork and other files in the cloud. (You can also store images and videos here. But these platforms tend to manage smaller files such as documents better.)
Many of us use a DMS like Google Drive or Sharepoint every day.
Content management, especially at organizational levels, makes life easier for everyone involved in production and distribution. But do web content management systems achieve the same feat?
Most do not. Web content management and related systems should ideally provide an efficient system for:
Now think, how many web CMS platforms allow for all of the above processes? It’s tough to come up with any names, which brings us to some of the downsides of using CMS platforms.
Where do many web content management systems fall short? There are a handful of areas.
When most of the top CMS platforms barely include half the functions above, it’s time to face a harsh truth. Most CMS platforms aren’t actually for content management. They’re designed for publishing content.
Content managers typically create content plans and take inventory with a tool like Google Sheets. They write content and edit on Google Docs. They organize images in Google Drive. And, finally, they copy and paste to the CMS where they’ll only schedule or publish.
Many CMS platforms also have a bit of a learning curve. New users sometimes need training in managing plugins, loading content, and publishing. Some members may even need basic HTML knowledge to configure extra functionality.
One great thing about “what you see is what you get” (WYSIWYG) systems like WordPress is the wide range of available plugins. Even though they extend functionality, plugins have their downsides too.
And there can also be difficulties with scaling.
Plus, some web content management systems:
But there are significant benefits to using a robust CMS that intentionally limits these issues.
What are some of the pros to balance out the cons above?
Speed and ease of use are among the top benefits that come to mind. A good CMS makes getting your site up and running—even with a few customizations—easy. It simplifies the process of publishing and updating content according to your editorial guidelines. And that’s not all. Louise, mentioned earlier, added:
A platform that makes it simple to manage content solo and collaborate with others is a huge asset.
Not everyone needs visibility into your CMS. And, even out of the people that do, not all need unrestricted access. For example, the latter could be true of internal subject matter experts whose forte isn’t writing. You may want them to review and comment on a piece of content for accuracy but restrict them from directly making changes.
Most web content management systems allow you to adjust a person’s access. You can identify them as writers, contributors, commenters, editors, or administrators.
WCM systems are a safety net, especially from a search engine optimization standpoint. Cameron explained why:
As you can see, there are good reasons to use a WCMS, provided that it’s actually for content management.
Web content management tools should do what their name says: manage content creation from start to finish. Not just handle publishing.
Thankfully, more content management platforms are stepping up to make content management less of a juggling act. GatherContent is at the top of the list. Here’s how GatherContent simplifies web content management:
Using the right WCM system can revolutionize the way you create and manage content, making you faster and more productive. But how can you identify the right one? Checking out an in-depth comparison of GatherContent vs. other WCM systems can help you decide.
Web content management represents only a fraction of those earnings. But with millions of blogs on the internet, that number is growing. As a result, many content managers are looking for ways to create, edit, publish, and update content more efficiently.
However, the big question is: are web content management systems sufficient for every content production phase? Or is there a better, more seamless way to create content on the web?
First, let’s consider some common system types within the broader realm of content management. Then, we’ll cover the purpose, pros, and cons of web content management systems specifically, and what their future looks like. Not to mention how they help you execute the content-specific aspects of your digital marketing strategy from end to end.
Any content creator will tell you that there are several types of content. Similarly, there's a variety of content management systems.
Here are some types of content management systems you use in your personal and work life:
WCMSs help users create, edit, publish, and update web page content without needing web development skills or markup languages.
Without them, we’d all need to be proficient HTML users to write and publish website content. (I couldn't do that. Could you?) These systems allow us to create front-end content easily while they handle the back-end code.
Popular WCMS providers include WordPress.com, Joomla, and Drupal.
Digital asset management systems enable users to upload, store, organize, and share digital assets. Companies use them to store logos, videos, audio files, presentations, documents, and even digital content for sale.
These DAM systems allow for regular updating, backup, and syncing across the organization. Admin users can also set permissions, grant, deny, or revoke access to their assets over time.
Examples of DAM systems are Aprimo and Adobe Experience Manager Assets.
Enterprise content management is a company-wide management solution. Organization and distribution of assets and content are at the core of this system type.
Technically, DAM is a type of ECM. An organization’s ECM is how it manages all content, from product data and inventory to digital assets and documents.
Popular examples of enterprise content management systems include Microsoft and IBM.
This form of content management is among the more complex systems. A CCM system manages content at the word, phrase, and paragraph level instead of recording pages and pages of content.
CCM systems use extensible markup language (XML), which is a bit like HTML, to manage content.
One common CCM system is DITA CCMS by IXIASOFT.
Document management systems store digital paperwork and other files in the cloud. (You can also store images and videos here. But these platforms tend to manage smaller files such as documents better.)
Many of us use a DMS like Google Drive or Sharepoint every day.
Content management, especially at organizational levels, makes life easier for everyone involved in production and distribution. But do web content management systems achieve the same feat?
Most do not. Web content management and related systems should ideally provide an efficient system for:
Now think, how many web CMS platforms allow for all of the above processes? It’s tough to come up with any names, which brings us to some of the downsides of using CMS platforms.
Where do many web content management systems fall short? There are a handful of areas.
When most of the top CMS platforms barely include half the functions above, it’s time to face a harsh truth. Most CMS platforms aren’t actually for content management. They’re designed for publishing content.
Content managers typically create content plans and take inventory with a tool like Google Sheets. They write content and edit on Google Docs. They organize images in Google Drive. And, finally, they copy and paste to the CMS where they’ll only schedule or publish.
Many CMS platforms also have a bit of a learning curve. New users sometimes need training in managing plugins, loading content, and publishing. Some members may even need basic HTML knowledge to configure extra functionality.
One great thing about “what you see is what you get” (WYSIWYG) systems like WordPress is the wide range of available plugins. Even though they extend functionality, plugins have their downsides too.
And there can also be difficulties with scaling.
Plus, some web content management systems:
But there are significant benefits to using a robust CMS that intentionally limits these issues.
What are some of the pros to balance out the cons above?
Speed and ease of use are among the top benefits that come to mind. A good CMS makes getting your site up and running—even with a few customizations—easy. It simplifies the process of publishing and updating content according to your editorial guidelines. And that’s not all. Louise, mentioned earlier, added:
A platform that makes it simple to manage content solo and collaborate with others is a huge asset.
Not everyone needs visibility into your CMS. And, even out of the people that do, not all need unrestricted access. For example, the latter could be true of internal subject matter experts whose forte isn’t writing. You may want them to review and comment on a piece of content for accuracy but restrict them from directly making changes.
Most web content management systems allow you to adjust a person’s access. You can identify them as writers, contributors, commenters, editors, or administrators.
WCM systems are a safety net, especially from a search engine optimization standpoint. Cameron explained why:
As you can see, there are good reasons to use a WCMS, provided that it’s actually for content management.
Web content management tools should do what their name says: manage content creation from start to finish. Not just handle publishing.
Thankfully, more content management platforms are stepping up to make content management less of a juggling act. GatherContent is at the top of the list. Here’s how GatherContent simplifies web content management:
Using the right WCM system can revolutionize the way you create and manage content, making you faster and more productive. But how can you identify the right one? Checking out an in-depth comparison of GatherContent vs. other WCM systems can help you decide.